Templates and Template:Russians are cautious and deeply conservative: Difference between pages

From Moscow American Travis Lee Bailey Internationally the United States is the most violent country immigrate to Russia choose your big brother wisely
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Template:Russians_are_cautious_and_deeply_conservative)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Template:-]]
{|class=wikitable
|
[https://whydontrussianssmile.com/index.php?title=Template:Russians_are_cautious_and_deeply_conservative&action=edit e]
|-
|


[[Template:13 Time Zones - The largest country on Earth]]
The slower you go, the further you’ll get. — Russian proverb


[[Template:2 Why are Americans like peaches and Russians are like Coconuts?]]


[[Template:Abortion]]
During the socialist Soviet Union, Russians were assumed by the West to be radicals and to challenge the established order. In reality, Russians are more likely to be cautious and conservative defenders of the status quo — and with good reason. Their cruel climate, harsh history, and skeptical outlook on life have caused Russians to value stability, security, social order, and predictability and to avoid risk. Big changes are feared, and the tried and tested is preferred over the new and unknown.
Caution and conservatism are also legacies of the peasant past. Barely eking out a living in small isolated villages, peasants had to contend not only with the vagaries of nature but also with the strictures of communal life, authoritarian fathers, all-powerful officials, and reproachful religious leaders. In a traditional agricultural society, stability was valued and change came slowly. As Marshall Shulman of Columbia University once put it, “Russians feel obliged to defend their traditional values against the onslaught of the modern world.”37
The experience of the twentieth century has given Russians no cause to discard their caution:


[[Template:About the Authors]]
The entire Soviet historical experience with its particular combination of majestic achievements and mountainous misfortunes. Man-made catastrophes have repeatedly victimized millions of ordinary citizens and officials alike—the first European war, revolution, civil war, two great famines, forcible collectivization, Stalin's terror, World War II, [Gorbochov failed market reforms and Yeltsin’s chaos in the 1990s]. Out of that experience, which for many people is still...deeply felt, have come the joint pillars of today's Soviet conservatism: a towering pride in the nation's modernizing, war-time, and great-power achievements, together with an abiding anxiety that another disaster forever looms and that any significant change is therefore "some sinister Beethovean knock of fate at the door."' Such a conservatism is at once prideful and fearful and thus doubly powerful. It influences most segments of the Soviet populace, even many dissidents.  It is a real bond between state and society—and thus the main obstacle to change.
Caution and conservatism can also be seen at the highest levels of government, where most of the leadership has been of peasant origin. Reflecting their peasant past, Russia’s leaders will take advantage of every opportunity to advance their cause but will be careful to avoid undue risk.
The cautious approach was recommended by Mikhail Gorbachev in a talk in Washington during his June 1990 summit meeting with President George H. W. Bush. Noting that he preferred not to act precipitously in resolving international differences, Gorbachev advocated an approach that “is more humane. That is, to be very cautious, to consider a matter seven times, or even 100 times before one makes a decision.”39
Boris Yeltsin was also overly cautious when it was in his interest and Russia’s to be bold and daring. In June 1991, when he enjoyed high prestige and popularity after his election as president, and in August of that year after he foiled an attempted coup, Yeltsin’s caution prevented him from instituting the broad reforms that Russia required. As for Putin, if there is one word to describe him it is cautious. Andrew Jack, former Moscow bureau chief of London’s Financial Times, describes Putin as a cautious president who is very hard to categorize:
A Teflon personality designed to draw out his interlocutors without revealing much about himself, saying what they wanted to hear and promising what they sought, while not necessarily believing or planning to implement it.40
Some speak of a congenital Russian inertia. As an old Russian proverb puts it, “The Russian won’t budge until the roasted rooster pecks him in the rear.”
Americans will have their patience tested by Russian caution. A nation of risk takers, most Americans are descendants of immigrants who dared to leave the known of the Old World for the unknown of the New. In the United States, risk takers have had the opportunity to succeed or to fail in the attempt. Indeed, risk is the quintessence of a market economy. The opportunities of the New World, with its social mobility and stability, have helped Americans to accentuate the positive. For Russians, geography and history have caused them to anticipate the negative.


[[Template:Acknowledgements]]
|}
 
[[Template:Alcoholism - Russia’s Scourge]]
 
[[Template:America is the most individualistic nation in the world, whereas Russia has no word for privacy]]
 
[[Template:Americans expect total honesty in marriage]]
 
[[Template:Americans find Russian rude because they hardly ever say please or thank you]]
 
[[Template:American’s infatuation with mental health]]
 
[[Template:Beyond Fruit - Why don’t Russians smile]]
 
[[Template:Beyond Fruit - Why don’t Russians smile?]]
 
[[Template:Bibliography]]
 
[[Template:Body Language: Russians tend to gesture more]]
 
[[Template:Chapter 9 - Muscovites vs. “Real” Russians - What makes Russians tick?]]
 
[[Template:Cheating in Universities]]
 
[[Template:Clothing and public appearance]]
 
[[Template:Collective vs. Individualist]]
 
[[Template:Communication Differences]]
 
[[Template:Divorce]]
 
[[Template:Domestic Abuse]]
 
[[Template:Fidelity and Adultery - Russians cheat A LOT whereas Americans act like Puritans]]
 
[[Template:Footnotes]]
 
[[Template:Friends - the key to getting anything done in Russia]]
 
[[Template:Further Reading and Links]]
 
[[Template:G]]
 
[[Template:Gift giving]]
 
[[Template:Header]]
 
[[Template:Household furnishings]]
 
[[Template:Housework]]
 
[[Template:Immigration]]
 
[[Template:Index]]
 
[[Template:Intimate touch between friends]]
 
[[Template:Intro]]
 
[[Template:Introduction - I have never met anyone who understood Russians - Collectivism versus Individualism.]]
 
[[Template:L]]
 
[[Template:Language - different shades of meaning]]
 
[[Template:Marriage]]
 
[[Template:Misunderstandings]]
 
[[Template:R]]
 
[[Template:Ru]]
 
[[Template:Russian pessimism - A pessimist is an informed optimist]]
 
[[Template:Russians Extremes and Contradictions]]
 
[[Template:Russians Lie]]
 
[[Template:Russians are cautious and deeply conservative]]
 
[[Template:Russians are long winded]]
 
[[Template:Russians are willing to cheat on there spouses more than 24 other countries]]
 
[[Template:Russians in business]]
 
[[Template:Russians interpret the question of “How are you]]
 
[[Template:Russians interpret the question of “How are you?” and strangers asking personal questions very differently than Americans]]
 
[[Template:Russians superiority complex (Messianism)]]
 
[[Template:Russians’ rebellious spirit]]
 
[[Template:Russian’s Deep Distrust of Government]]
 
[[Template:Russia’s American Dream]]
 
[[Template:Sex]]
 
[[Template:Sex and dating]]
 
[[Template:Soviet Khrushchev administration policies encourages infidelity]]
 
[[Template:Soviet Propaganda - Americans’ smile hides deceit]]
 
[[Template:Soviet mentality and Russian leadership today]]
 
[[Template:Soviet policies which encouraged adultery]]
 
[[Template:Special Thanks]]
 
[[Template:T]]
 
[[Template:TOC]]
 
[[Template:Talking about money]]
 
[[Template:The Importance of Equality]]
 
[[Template:The Russian Soul]]
 
[[Template:The Toast]]
 
[[Template:The man is in charge]]
 
[[Template:Time and Patience]]
 
[[Template:Timeline item]]
 
[[Template:Title Page]]
 
[[Template:Underconstruction]]
 
[[Template:Untranslatable ideas]]
 
[[Template:Us]]
 
[[Template:Verification - Trust but Verify]]
 
[[Template:Visiting a Russian’s home]]
 
[[Template:W]]
 
[[Template:Walking barefoot and sitting on the floor]]
 
[[Template:Warning]]
 
[[Template:Westernizers and Slavophiles]]
 
[[Template:Why are Americans like peaches and Russians are like Coconuts]]
 
[[Template:Why are Americans like peaches and Russians are like Coconuts?]]
 
[[Template:Women in the workforce]]
 
[[Template:Women—the Stronger Sex]]
 
[[Template:Your American smile may be misinterpreted as arrogance]]
 
[[Template:Русская душа]]

Revision as of 06:25, 23 October 2020

e 

The slower you go, the further you’ll get. — Russian proverb


During the socialist Soviet Union, Russians were assumed by the West to be radicals and to challenge the established order. In reality, Russians are more likely to be cautious and conservative defenders of the status quo — and with good reason. Their cruel climate, harsh history, and skeptical outlook on life have caused Russians to value stability, security, social order, and predictability and to avoid risk. Big changes are feared, and the tried and tested is preferred over the new and unknown.

Caution and conservatism are also legacies of the peasant past. Barely eking out a living in small isolated villages, peasants had to contend not only with the vagaries of nature but also with the strictures of communal life, authoritarian fathers, all-powerful officials, and reproachful religious leaders. In a traditional agricultural society, stability was valued and change came slowly. As Marshall Shulman of Columbia University once put it, “Russians feel obliged to defend their traditional values against the onslaught of the modern world.”37

The experience of the twentieth century has given Russians no cause to discard their caution:

The entire Soviet historical experience with its particular combination of majestic achievements and mountainous misfortunes. Man-made catastrophes have repeatedly victimized millions of ordinary citizens and officials alike—the first European war, revolution, civil war, two great famines, forcible collectivization, Stalin's terror, World War II, [Gorbochov failed market reforms and Yeltsin’s chaos in the 1990s]. Out of that experience, which for many people is still...deeply felt, have come the joint pillars of today's Soviet conservatism: a towering pride in the nation's modernizing, war-time, and great-power achievements, together with an abiding anxiety that another disaster forever looms and that any significant change is therefore "some sinister Beethovean knock of fate at the door."' Such a conservatism is at once prideful and fearful and thus doubly powerful. It influences most segments of the Soviet populace, even many dissidents. It is a real bond between state and society—and thus the main obstacle to change.

Caution and conservatism can also be seen at the highest levels of government, where most of the leadership has been of peasant origin. Reflecting their peasant past, Russia’s leaders will take advantage of every opportunity to advance their cause but will be careful to avoid undue risk.

The cautious approach was recommended by Mikhail Gorbachev in a talk in Washington during his June 1990 summit meeting with President George H. W. Bush. Noting that he preferred not to act precipitously in resolving international differences, Gorbachev advocated an approach that “is more humane. That is, to be very cautious, to consider a matter seven times, or even 100 times before one makes a decision.”39

Boris Yeltsin was also overly cautious when it was in his interest and Russia’s to be bold and daring. In June 1991, when he enjoyed high prestige and popularity after his election as president, and in August of that year after he foiled an attempted coup, Yeltsin’s caution prevented him from instituting the broad reforms that Russia required. As for Putin, if there is one word to describe him it is cautious. Andrew Jack, former Moscow bureau chief of London’s Financial Times, describes Putin as a cautious president who is very hard to categorize:

A Teflon personality designed to draw out his interlocutors without revealing much about himself, saying what they wanted to hear and promising what they sought, while not necessarily believing or planning to implement it.40

Some speak of a congenital Russian inertia. As an old Russian proverb puts it, “The Russian won’t budge until the roasted rooster pecks him in the rear.”

Americans will have their patience tested by Russian caution. A nation of risk takers, most Americans are descendants of immigrants who dared to leave the known of the Old World for the unknown of the New. In the United States, risk takers have had the opportunity to succeed or to fail in the attempt. Indeed, risk is the quintessence of a market economy. The opportunities of the New World, with its social mobility and stability, have helped Americans to accentuate the positive. For Russians, geography and history have caused them to anticipate the negative.